Consensus and conflict among ecological forecasts of Zika virus outbreaks in the United States

Printer-friendly versionPDF version
Mar 21, 2018
Author: 
Colin J. Carlson, Eric Dougherty, Mike Boots, Wayne Getz & Sadie J. Ryan

 

Abstract

Ecologists are increasingly involved in the pandemic prediction process. In the course of the Zika outbreak in the Americas, several ecological models were developed to forecast the potential global distribution of the disease. Conflicting results produced by alternative methods are unresolved, hindering the development of appropriate public health forecasts. We compare ecological niche models and experimentally-driven mechanistic forecasts for Zika transmission in the continental United States. We use generic and uninformed stochastic county-level simulations to demonstrate the downstream epidemiological consequences of conflict among ecological models, and show how assumptions and parameterization in the ecological and epidemiological models propagate uncertainty and produce downstream model conflict. We conclude by proposing a basic consensus method that could resolve conflicting models of potential outbreak geography and seasonality. Our results illustrate the usually-undocumented margin of uncertainty that could emerge from using any one of these predictions without reservation or qualification. In the short term, ecologists face the task of developing better post hoc consensus that accurately forecasts spatial patterns of Zika virus outbreaks. Ultimately, methods are needed that bridge the gap between ecological and epidemiological approaches to predicting transmission and realistically capture both outbreak size and geography.

Read the full article in Scientific Reports.

Associated SESYNC Researcher(s): 
DOI for citing: 
10.1038/s41598-018-22989-0
Share: Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Linked Icon